Republicans want to keep hiding government contractors money
 |
Here we go again.
Recently, I wrote to you about the crazy
“Keeping Politics Out of Federal Contracting Act” (KPOFCA), which would
keep secret political spending by federal contractors like Northrop
Grumman and Academi (formerly Blackwater) in the dark.
Now Congressional Republicans are fighting
transparency on another front. On a party-line vote, the House GOP stuck
language in a must-pass appropriations bill that, unless the Senate
takes it out, will block significant new transparency requirements for
political ads.
Don’t let corporate cronies block political spending transparency.
Urge your senators to remove the House GOP’s dark money language and to oppose KPOFCA (S. 1100).
What are the transparency requirements that corporations are so afraid of?
Well, the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) recently created a new rule that requires TV stations to make the
information they collect about political ad spending available on the
Internet.
This is information the TV stations are already
collecting, and the data is already public. However, right now it’s only
accessible by physically going to a TV station and requesting the
files.
The new rule is just a modernizing update to
how things work in the 21st Century. If the data is truly public, it
should be posted online.
The House GOP’s anti-disclosure language in the
appropriations bill specifically strips the FCC’s funding to implement
the rule.
Tell your senators to support the FCC rule and to oppose secret political spending by federal contractors.
KPOFCA, meanwhile, has already passed out of the Senate Homeland Security Committee.
Backed by Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), whose
top campaign contributor is General Dynamics (a military contractor that
makes fighter jets) and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) whose top
contributor is Northrop Grumman (another military contractor), KPOFCA
would prevent the government from requiring federal contractors to
disclose money they’re spending to influence elections.
According to proponents of the bill, keeping
political spending by government contractors secret somehow protects the
integrity of the contracting process. If this information is not
public, their “logic” goes, then politicians won’t know if a corporation
receiving government funds for contracts helped get them elected.
Here’s how things work in the real world: If a
federal contractor’s CEO pours millions into electing a candidate the
CEO thinks will reward the corporation with government contracts, then
the CEO will find a way to make sure that the candidate knows.
All KPOFCA does is keep the public, not politicians, in the dark.
Tell
your senators to oppose this bill that would keep secret political
spending by federal contractors in the dark and to support the FCC’s
transparency update.
 |
|
Thanks for all you do,
Rick Claypool
Public Citizen’s Online Action Team
action@citizen.org |
P.S. For a limited time, a group of longtime
Public Citizen supporters will match any contribution,
dollar-for-dollar, up to $500,000. Donate now and your gift will go twice as far in support of the work we’re doing together to challenge corporate power. |
|
© 2012 Public Citizen • 1600 20th Street, NW / Washington, D.C. 20009 • www.citizen.org
|
|
2 comments:
Government Contracting have specified entitlements and tasks that do not suit with those of contractor employees. Is important such as pay, promotion, retirement, firing,hiring,education, training all differ between government and contractor employees and differ between different contractors.
Before becoming an employee, it would behoove anyone to have a look at the contract between you and whoever is paying you. I know in the state of Washington, for instance, that STATE contractors must pay anyone hired temp or otherwise minimum of the lowest union wage on the job.
Post a Comment